Saturday
Dec152007
Poll: Kings vs Blue Jackets
Saturday · Dec 15 · 2007 | 2:57 PM PST |  | |
KINGS | BLUE JACKETS |
Place your vote and then feel free to leave a comment as to how you came to your decision. Tell all your friends to drop in and vote! The more voices heard, the more accurate the results!
| Poll opening date Sat Dec 15 | Poll closing date Wed Dec 19 |
07SCTRN | #1H | LAKvCBJ
Reader Comments (15)
That L.A. logo is the real deal, I mean its got everything to do with the kings. It beats their primary logo by a tone,they never should of switched.
kings logo is majestic to say the least just beautiful
A shield vs. a hat.
Huh.
Shield by about seven billion times. Even in purple.
if you look closer, the lion on the king shield is wearing glasses. im sure thats an accurate representation of the fans in la. pedestrian at best. i also find it weird that this secondary logo was their primary logo albeit for a short period.
wearing sun glass cause its sunny in LA
classic that lion is money and he doesn't even no it
This should be the Blue Jackets' primary logo.
sunny or b/c of too much smog?
The Kings logo is good, but the purple ruins it for me. There is no context in which purple should be used in a jersey. And that Columbus logo is better than their primary. Edge Jackets.
The logo is purple because most people see purple as a royal colour. The Sacramento Kings and a basketball team in Australia (Sydney Kings) use purple in their logo too.
Kings should use that as their primary and use the crown logo as the secondary.
flame, let it go, you're not the first team to get screwed by the officials for the Cup.
jason, where were you from 1998 to 2002?
http://sportslogos.net/team.php?id=14
As much as that Kings logo might be half decent itself, I cannot get past the purple. It is gawdawful ugly. There is no excuse for it. Columbus by default here.
I didn't say that they haven't used it before, Bryan. I said that they should now.
jason, so why now?
Because I like it better than the crown logo they're using now.